BAPTISM and RESURRECTION
The word ‘baptism’ is itself Greek - baptizo.
In English it is properly ‘dip’, ‘plunge’ or ‘immerse’ (not sprinkle). We have
taken over the Greek word un-translated for religious purposes. Immersion is
the only NT practice. No other method is found in the NT.
Baptism has no saving value – Paul said he came to preach
the Gospel, not baptise. 1 Cor. 1.17. Many Scriptures
make it clear that baptism is only for believers. Acts 8:12 and Acts 10. 44-48. The same applied to
some who were baptised – Lydia and her
household, the Philippians jailor, the household of Stephanus for example. It
is not a means of salvation. Nor does
baptism have any spiritual effect, but demonstrates personal commitment.
Baptism became a major ‘means of grace’ in the Catholic
church, and even children had to be baptised as soon as possible or they would go to
Limbo. The present Pope Benedict 16, (speaking ex cathedra) this year
abolished Limbo. Faith the RC say is not
the cause of justification, and the lack of faith in the child is
replaced by the faith of the Church. In
Anglicanism is it replaced by godparents to believe for the child. The RC position is that baptism – as a
physical act – when complete is effective.
But it seems that it has little relationship with the Resurrection.
Theology for our dedication
service. It is more than asking God’s blessing on the life of
the child. We seriously hand the child
over to God, and having done so we give the child back to the mother as
belonging to God for her to nurse her or
him FOR THE LORD and from God receive the wages. This should be expressed. A
child has a Christian name because it is given or pronounced by a minister in a
public service. Pentecostals do not
practice paedobaptism because children have no independent faith in Christ –
parents may be keen for their children to display such precocious spiritual
evidences, but their offsprings should reach some kind of firm maturity. In the Methodist and other churches it is
taught that paedobaptism is for the infant children of believing parents.
The RC church teaches
that baptism is necessary for salvation. Children baptised are ‘regenerated’,
spiritually reborn and become a member of the body of Christ, the church.
In effect the Church claims the power to save. This was a central issue in the
Reformation. But RC says that in emergency anyone can baptise a child – even an
unbeliever, and so where it is performed in less than a sanctified manner, it
still leaves a mark on the soul.
We teach that baptism is not necessary for salvation, but it
is necessary as a mark of obedience and love for Christ. Mark 16:16. “He who believes and is
baptised will be saved” …
but it does NOT SAY
that those who are not baptised will be damned. It is written simply to be
understood. Baptism has always been
normal in Christian churches – with one or two exceptions. The first people to baptise a second time were a
worry to Luther, but they seem to have
been identified with a political movement also, producing the Peasants War and
Luther was against them. They would drown
them in rivers
and casks of water. It is best for a pastor to baptise if possible to signify
it as sacred to the church. We were commanded by Christ to Baptise – Matthew
28.
No ceremony bestows salvation. Col. 2.12 “buried with
him in baptism you were also raised by him through faith”. 1 Peter 3.21. “Baptism now saves you not as a removal of
dirt from the body, but the pledge of a good conscience towards God. It saves
you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ”.
It is not the equivalent of circumcision, which was a covenant sign
between national Israel and God
bringing a person into the community of Israel. Baptism is not a covenant sign bringing
anyone into the Christian community. Nor is the church ever spoken of in terms
of a covenant community entered by a physical rite or performance. It is by the ‘circumcision
of the heart”. The whole concept of
the people of God changes in the NT from national physical-politico to a spiritual relationship with God,
about which almost nobody in the OT understood or experienced.
It is generally taught that when Jesus said “You must
be born of water and the Spirit” he meant baptism into the church. (I wrote to a member of the Iona
community who said this, this week). That could not be however as there was no
church then. It would be too long to fully explain here, but by ‘water’ he
meant the water through which Israel in its formation passed as at the Red Sea,
and John the Baptist said the nation needed to start again – His repentance
baptism being the symbol of a national new start through the waters. But Jesus told Nicodemus it to be by the
Spirit, not just water.
People testify to God’s presence and blessing in Baptism –
including healing, but this is because of their faith and obedience. It is only for believers – again only
believers were shown as being baptised in the NT in every instances in Acts.
The reference in 1 Cor. 15.27 to being baptised for the
dead, is not mandatory nor is
the Greek in the imperative. It refers to a practice apparently
which some followed but has no value or Scriptural support. Paul mentioned it but it seems he gave it no importance as he would regard
it as an outward rite with no spiritual significance. Cults pick up unusual
texts like this. It is a Mormon emphasis.
The RC Mass prays for the dead, but no RC practice of baptism for the
dead.
The purpose of Baptism is to identify with Christ, not just with His
baptism. We are
not baptised because He was baptised, to copy Him, any more than
we should be crucified to copy Him, or it turns baptism into a RC sacrament. He
was baptised FOR US. We are not baptised FOR Him. Being baptised is not our service to Him. He
was ‘numbered with transgressors’ and said ‘it becomes US to fulfil
all righteousness’. We are baptised
INTO Him and into the body of Christ – the church of the born again. Identifying ourselves with Christ and His
church in this physical manner, is a sign that He has
first identified with us, that all He did for us we have, is ours. His birth,
life, healings, ministry, sufferings, death, resurrection, ascension,
appearance in glory and His return, are all for us – He gains nothing. The work of the Holy Spirit bringing the benefits
of Christ’s work to us, is dynamic.
John and Jesus at first preached baptism ‘unto repentance.’ So also did Peter in His first Gospel sermon.
But Baptism had other meanings. In early times it took a brave heart as it
demonstrated that a person had become a Christian and marked them for
persecution.
Baptism is a sign of our (previous) experience – it is not
necessarily a spiritual resurrection itself, though of course it might
coincide. To say we are spiritually
raised with Christ is as a sign, not as an experience. We do not give sacerdotal - sacramental -
priestly powers to those who baptise church folk. Baptism regarded as a physical
act with a spiritual effect suggests it has sacramental value, which is
Catholic. We do not accept that any
physical act has spiritual effects except performed with a faith motive. With faith, all we do has spiritual value. Jesus said that a cup
of cold water to a disciple has significance with God. This ends all sacramentalism but some churches –
like the CoE call it a sacrament without teaching RC doctrine.
Baptism after the apostolic period acquired much
more significance and in early Christian times was considered a good way to
wash away sins. Constantine
the Emperor would not be baptised till his death bed to get as many sins
forgiven as advanced in life as possible. Acts 22:16 ”Rise and be
baptised, and wash away your sins’, calling on His name”. Baptism is there spoken of as part of Paul’s conversion. Peter preached (Acts 2.38:) “Repent and be baptised every one of you for
the forgiveness of your sins.” This translation has come down to us began
with versions affected by RC teaching. The Greek word is not
‘for’, but ‘eis’ - ‘unto’, ‘with a view to’, not ‘by means
of’, which is a different Greek word - ‘ina’.
An interesting fact, many of the baptism
formularies in churches across the centuries included chrism – oil anointing to
impart the Holy Spirit to a candidate. They all reckoned receiving the Spirit
as a second experience after new birth like we Pentecostals say.
The major message - the ‘ kerygma’ of the
church – the Gospel, is that Christ died for us (symbolised in
Communion) and that He rose for us (symbolised in baptism). This makes Him lord
of all because He died and rose for all.
The significance of Baptism has been confused often. But the N T stresses it as a re-enactment in the
believer of what happened to Jesus, not at His baptism but at His death and
when He rose again. Baptism is a public witness to resurrection – and
candidates should have
shown some sign of resurrection in their lives- usually being
saved.
Again, this rite is physical, like bread and
wine, and every doctrine and promise of the NT has the material, physical side
– Christianity is for this world, its promises for this world, and it was
produced in this world of hard reality.
That is the Pentecostal revolution and contribution of theology.
______________
George Canty April 2009.